The verdict of the Supreme Court of India
The verdict of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's objection to the Teesta water sharing agreement has been delayed by a verdict of the Indian Supreme Court in Delhi. According to the verdict given on Friday, the river is said to be none other than the river. No state can take the right to water the river. '
The Supreme Court has given a verdict in the verdict of the water sharing dispute case of South India. Although the verdict with the water of the Kaveri river is significant, the ruling of the Supreme Court gives strong power to the decision of the central government alone, ignoring the objection of West Bengal to Teesta with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Naturally, the judgment of the Indian Supreme Court in the year of the national election is a relief for Bangladesh's Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, diplomats of the two countries.
According to the Indian Constitution, Mamata Banerjee was claiming that "the importance of the state and the importance of the state on the issue of Teesta water for farmers' interests in the framework of the United Kingdom. First, Manmohan Singh and Modi, both wish to emphasize the Chief Minister of West Bengal, Mamta Apte, in accordance with the conditions of the constitution, but could not enter Teesta water sharing agreement with Bangladesh. When she came to Delhi last year, Modi gave hope to Teesta when she came to Delhi But Mamta could not complete the contract despite the fact that Delhi could go ahead with the deal. But the verdict of the Supreme Court on Friday, the hands of the Prime Minister and the central government strengthened. The bench of three judges led by Chief Justice of India Deepak Mishra said, 'The river is not in any particular state. River country's resources. No state can claim to be its own. Where there is a deficit, water should be used only for the needs. '
After this verdict, the central government will be able to bring Mamta to the path, otherwise, the Teesta water sharing agreement with Dhaka will be implemented without the importance of demand of West Bengal. If Mamata goes to the court to issue objections, in the case of the country's highest court, the Teesta water-sharing agreement can be completed by the Indian government.
On the instructions of the Supreme Court, Tamilnadu on the same day, the quantum of Karnataka water was increased by reducing the amount of water for the state. In Bangalore, a large number of residents live in. By increasing logical demand, the demand for drinking water is 14.75 thousand million cubic feet (TMCT). Diplomats believe that the verdict of the Supreme Court politically crucial before a few months before the assembly elections in Karnataka. { Source }
The Supreme Court has given a verdict in the verdict of the water sharing dispute case of South India. Although the verdict with the water of the Kaveri river is significant, the ruling of the Supreme Court gives strong power to the decision of the central government alone, ignoring the objection of West Bengal to Teesta with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Naturally, the judgment of the Indian Supreme Court in the year of the national election is a relief for Bangladesh's Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, diplomats of the two countries.
According to the Indian Constitution, Mamata Banerjee was claiming that "the importance of the state and the importance of the state on the issue of Teesta water for farmers' interests in the framework of the United Kingdom. First, Manmohan Singh and Modi, both wish to emphasize the Chief Minister of West Bengal, Mamta Apte, in accordance with the conditions of the constitution, but could not enter Teesta water sharing agreement with Bangladesh. When she came to Delhi last year, Modi gave hope to Teesta when she came to Delhi But Mamta could not complete the contract despite the fact that Delhi could go ahead with the deal. But the verdict of the Supreme Court on Friday, the hands of the Prime Minister and the central government strengthened. The bench of three judges led by Chief Justice of India Deepak Mishra said, 'The river is not in any particular state. River country's resources. No state can claim to be its own. Where there is a deficit, water should be used only for the needs. '
After this verdict, the central government will be able to bring Mamta to the path, otherwise, the Teesta water sharing agreement with Dhaka will be implemented without the importance of demand of West Bengal. If Mamata goes to the court to issue objections, in the case of the country's highest court, the Teesta water-sharing agreement can be completed by the Indian government.
On the instructions of the Supreme Court, Tamilnadu on the same day, the quantum of Karnataka water was increased by reducing the amount of water for the state. In Bangalore, a large number of residents live in. By increasing logical demand, the demand for drinking water is 14.75 thousand million cubic feet (TMCT). Diplomats believe that the verdict of the Supreme Court politically crucial before a few months before the assembly elections in Karnataka. { Source }
About Unknown
No comments